LEGAL TIMES AUGUST 14, 1995
USER FRIENDLY
BY BARRY D. BAYER & BENJAMIN H. COHEN
Casing Litigation-Support Software
We've read a lot about litigation support technology, but
everyone seems to have a different idea of what litigation
support is. The phrase has been applied to calendar programs,
programs that create lists of documents, software that creates
and displays photograph equivalents and reconstructive motion
pictures, document imaging systems, cost-recovery systems, and a
host of other candidates.
And to some lesser or greater extent, each of these
support functions are integral to litigation.
Rather than adopt anyone else's specific definitions, we
thought we would provide an overview of the products available
to assist litigation efforts. We'll mention specific products
not as endorsements, but simply as examples of the product
category being discussed.
We divide "litigation-support" products into two major
categories: systems that help keep track of the people and
events involved in a case, and systems that aid the collection,
organization, and understanding of the facts and law of the
case, that help develop trial strategies, and that litigators
can use in preparing for trial.
In the first category, we have calendar and docketing
programs and so-called case-management systems, which record
everything you could possibly wish to know about what is
happening with each case in the office. A case-management system
is a highly structured database that stores information about
the case.
The classic program is Chesapeake Software's PINS,
specially designed for plaintiffs' personal injury attorneys.
BACK TO BASICS
Such a program starts with basic information about the
client, the court, the judge, opposing party and counsel,
witnesses, insurance adjusters, and responsible office
personnel. This information can be reviewed on a case-by-case
basis or, as a byproduct, on a category-by-category basis. For
example, if you wish to know which adjuster is involved with the
case, simply pull up the case file. If you wish to know what
other active cases involve that same adjuster or how the firm
has done with that adjuster on closed cases, a few keystrokes
should display a report of all cases in which the firm dealt
with that adjuster. Thus, the case-management system not only
assists with individual cases, but also helps manage the firm's
entire litigation practice.
Along the same lines, the case-management system should
store notes on the results of telephone conversations and
settlement discussions. There should also be a place to record
costs advanced and money received associated with the case,
although we would hope that, these days, such matters could be
integrated with the firm's general accounting system. The
program could, at the same time, be used to collect time-charge
data for eventual billing. Once again, at least some level of
integration with the firm's general time and billing system
would be hoped for.
Amicus Attorney performs many of these functions,
although the current version, to be updated soon, cannot handle
multiple users on a local area network.
A good case-management system includes a
calendar/docketing program that keeps track of every event that
has occurred or is scheduled on each case in the office. The
date that the file is opened and the statute-of-limitations date
are likely the first two entries, but other important dates,
including scheduled depositions and court appearances, due dates
for pleadings and memorandums, closing dates for discovery, and
the date of trial, are included as well.
Entries can be made either to a case docket or to an
overall calendar, but because of the versatility of the database
program, calendar information can be retrieved either generally
or for a specific case. Thus, an attorney working on a specific
case can be interested in the information about that case, while
someone responsible for ensuring that all of tomorrow's routine
"court calls" are handled efficiently can look at all such
matters on a given day and assign staff so that each location is
covered.
A better case-management system includes rule-based
docket entry so that the entry of only one of a series of
related events automatically triggers the others. Therefore, if
the receipt of a complaint requires filing of an answer 30 days
later, the notation that a complaint has been received
automatically triggers a reminder as to when the answer is due.
Since such rules vary so widely by jurisdiction and by
firm practice, the system should make it easy for each firm to
set up its own rule sets to accommodate one jurisdiction's
rocket docket or a second jurisdiction's plodding schedule.
We recently reviewed the heavily promoted Abacus Law+,
which, despite the hype, is an excellent program running under
MS-DOS.
INTEGRATION NOW
The best case-management system does not have a separate
calendar database, but integrates, instead, with the firmwide
calendar system so that the individual schedules of each lawyer,
and even each conference room, can be considered as events are
set. Each litigation event will automatically appear on the
calendar of each attorney involved in the specific matter.
We must admit that although we know of some systems that
are close, such a "best" system may not yet exist in a mass
-marketed program. We wouldn't be surprised to see such a system
hit the stores soon.
Finally, a case-management system might be able to store
or at least link to formal pleadings and memorandums. With this
capability, a lawyer could, at his desk in the office, in court,
or at home, have complete control of virtually all information
about the case, making an extensive paper file little more than
a place to archive a case.
You don't have to buy a specialized case-management
program to get the job done. If you've purchased one of the
"suites" produced by Microsoft, Novell (formerly WordPerfect),
and Lotus Development, you already own Access, Paradox, or
Approach.
A good programmer using any of these packages or one of
the tried and true dBase clones, could develop an application
program to do whatever the commercially available case
-management programs can do.
We do not recommend the procedure for most firms,
however, as the $500 or $5,000 that a commercial program might
cost would be small change compared to the cost of programming
and debugging a major application.
As many of the case-management packages store information
in one of the standard database formats, it might make sense to
hire a programmer to write a routine to deal with the
information in some way not provided by the purchased case
-management package.
Cases must be managed, but they also must be prepared and
tried, and deposition testimony must be reviewed and analyzed.
Court reporters may furnish deposition testimony on disk
for use with CatLinks or Discovery, while such full-text
indexing products as Folio Views, ZyIndex, or dtSearch can be
used to build a searchable index. Such programs not only should
index, but also should permit the user to insert his or her own
notes into the record. Document production must be numbered and
listed, and these days should probably be scanned and converted
to text using OCR (optical character recognition) technology to
form a searchable full-text database in addition to the key
words associated with the scanned documents.
There are many scanners and OCR packages on the market,
but Hewlett Packard scanners and OCR software by Calera or
Xerox's Kurzweil are commonly used.
PREPARING A NOTEBOOK
Putting the deposition testimony and the document
discovery together, it should be easy to find all of the
information in the case referring or relating to Witness X or
Issue Y. Even with the ability to keep all of this information
online, some lawyers prefer to work with a physical notebook for
each witness.
Robins Analytic's Ready for Trial! gathers depositions,
documents, pleadings, and other matters as they relate to each
witness, and prints out a notebook, complete with divider tabs.
Litigation support can also include outline, idea
-generator, or cluster programs_Inspiration by Inspiration
Software Inc. is a good example_that allow the lawyer or
litigation team to display and organize known facts and organize
them around legal theories. Some of these programs try to
replicate group brainstorming that could be done with pen and
paper, or on a large bulletin board. The concept, of course, is
to toss what we know into the system, without analysis, and then
determine if patterns not previously relevant emerge.
Another product type we should mention is the decision
tree/risk analysis programs like Tree Age Software's DATA or
Applied Decision Analysis' DPL. These programs are not yet in
the user-friendly stage, but this type of analysis seems rather
powerful and could certainly help build a suitable case
strategy.
The user sets up various points in a litigation where
important decisions are to be made, assigns probabilities to the
possible results from each decision point, and thereupon
evaluates the expected value of the outcome of the litigation.
When this expected value is compared to likely cost, it should
be possible to make some early estimate of the most profitable
approach to the matter.
Outcome estimates in the personal injury field, of
course, can be determined by analyzing electronic verdict and
settlement databases for a best estimate of the value of the
case.
Finally, a good electronic spreadsheet program such as
Lotus' 1-2-3 or Excel can be vital in valuing everything from a
structured settlement to a spouse's pension rights.
Of course, we've skipped right by a plethora of software
and hardware that any litigator should consider in appropriate
circumstances_systems that create charts and other demonstrative
evidence, hardware that displays exhibits to the jury, programs
that build tables of authorities in briefs and others that can
check citations online, outline programs, research archive
programs, software and hardware that produce instant transcripts
online in the courtroom, and programs that keep track of
airline, meal, and hotel charges for those out of town trials.
And we have no doubt that someday soon the members of a
jury will be asked to don virtual-reality helmets and experience
a vivid recreation of what the victims of some horrific mass
tragedy must have felt in the minutes prior to death. (If a
picture is worth a thousand words, actually being there must be
worth more than a few pictures.)
But while a VR accident recreation may be some order of
magnitude more effective than a photograph, it is important to
recognize that almost none of the product types mentioned in
this article do things that litigators did not do before
computers. These products may work faster, more efficiently,
with less lawyer and paralegal effort, and sometimes more
effectively, but the litigator's traditional tasks of finding
out what happened and telling judge and jury why justice demands
a verdict in favor of his or her client still remain.
Barry D. Bayer practices law and writes about computers
from his office in Homewood, Ill. Benjamin H. Cohen is based in
Chicago. Distributed by the American Lawyer News Service, "User
Friendly" appears each week in Legal Times.
"User Friendly" is available electronically on NewsNet,
Predicasts Newsletter file, Westlaw in the LawPrac file, and
Lexis Counsel Connect. For more information, contact Law Office
Technology Review by writing to P.O. Box 2577, Homewood, Ill.
60430, or by sending e-mail to bbayer @bix.com, bbayer on MCI
Mail, to !bbayer on ABA/Net, or to Barry Bayer on Lexis Counsel
Connect.